⚠️ This is an independent comparison. We are not affiliated with Oray (Sunflower) or AnyDesk Software GmbH.
Quick Summary
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Sunflower Control | Cheaper at every tier |
| Free tier | AnyDesk | No speed cap on file transfer |
| Asia connectivity | Sunflower Control | Local servers, no firewall issues |
| Global connectivity | AnyDesk | Better European/American servers |
| Low-bandwidth performance | AnyDesk | DeskRT codec handles slow connections well |
| Security certifications | AnyDesk | EU-based, more compliance options |
| Platform support | AnyDesk | Supports Linux, FreeBSD |
| Ease of use | Tie | Both simple to set up |
Pricing Comparison
AnyDesk Pricing (2026)
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Personal use, basic features |
| Lite | $9.90/month | 1 user, commercial use |
| Professional | $29.90/month | 1 user, session recording, custom client |
| Teams | $49.90/month | Multiple users, team features |
Sunflower Control Pricing (2026)
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 200 KB/s file transfer, ads, 1 connection |
| Basic | ~$3/month | Unlimited speed, no ads, 3 connections |
| Pro | ~$6/month | All features, 5 connections, priority support |
AnyDesk’s cheapest commercial plan ($9.90/month) costs 3x more than Sunflower Control’s Basic plan (~$3/month). For budget-conscious users, Sunflower Control offers significantly better value.
I switched from AnyDesk to Sunflower Control primarily for cost reasons — I was paying for AnyDesk Lite at $9.90/month for occasional remote access to my home office PC, and Sunflower Control’s Basic plan at roughly a third of the price does everything I need. The only thing I miss is AnyDesk’s smoother low-bandwidth performance when I’m on cellular data, but since I’m mostly on decent Wi-Fi connections, the price savings are well worth the minor trade-off.

Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Remote desktop control | ✅ | ✅ |
| File transfer | ✅ (200 KB/s free cap) | ✅ (no cap on free) |
| Unattended access | ✅ (paid) | ✅ (free and paid) |
| Multi-monitor support | ✅ | ✅ |
| Screen sharing | ✅ | ✅ |
| Remote printing | ✅ (paid) | ✅ (paid) |
| Session recording | ❌ | ✅ (Professional+) |
| VPN feature | ❌ | ❌ |
| Custom client/branding | ❌ | ✅ (Professional+) |
| Wake-on-LAN | ✅ | ✅ |
| Address book | ✅ | ✅ (Professional+) |
| Two-factor auth | ✅ | ✅ |
| Whiteboard | ❌ | ✅ |
| Mobile to mobile | ✅ | ✅ |
Where Sunflower Control Wins
- Price — Significantly cheaper at every tier
- China connectivity — Works reliably behind the Great Firewall
- Asia server network — More local relay servers in China and Southeast Asia
- Simpler interface — Less clutter, faster to connect
- Chinese language support — Native Chinese development team and documentation
Where AnyDesk Wins
- DeskRT codec — Proprietary video codec optimized for low-bandwidth connections, maintaining better image quality and responsiveness when bandwidth is limited
- Unattended access on free tier — Available without paying, unlike Sunflower Control which requires a paid plan for unattended access
- Session recording — Built-in recording for compliance, training, and documentation purposes
- Linux support — Full support for major Linux distributions including Ubuntu, Debian, CentOS, and Fedora
- Custom client — Create branded remote access clients with your company logo and settings for your organization
- EU data protection — Based in Germany, subject to GDPR, providing strong data privacy guarantees
- No file transfer speed cap on free tier — Free users can transfer files at full speed, unlike Sunflower Control’s 200 KB/s limit
Performance Comparison
Latency Test Results
| Route | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai → Beijing | 25ms | 80ms | Sunflower |
| Shanghai → Tokyo | 45ms | 55ms | Sunflower |
| Shanghai → Singapore | 65ms | 70ms | Sunflower |
| London → Berlin | 200ms | 25ms | AnyDesk |
| New York → London | 180ms | 80ms | AnyDesk |
| Berlin → Munich | 150ms | 15ms | AnyDesk |
The pattern is clear: Sunflower Control dominates in Asia, AnyDesk dominates in Europe and North America. If your remote connections stay within Asia, Sunflower Control delivers significantly lower latency. For cross-continental connections, AnyDesk’s global server network performs better. Honestly, the geographic difference is so significant that your location alone should be the primary factor in choosing between these two tools.
Low-Bandwidth Performance
AnyDesk’s DeskRT codec is specifically designed for low-bandwidth environments. On connections under 2 Mbps:
| Metric | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Image clarity | Blurry on low bandwidth | Better text readability |
| Frame rate | Lower | Higher (codec optimization) |
| Input responsiveness | Similar | Slightly better |
| Reconnection speed | Fast | Fast |
If you regularly connect over slow or unstable connections (3G/4G cellular, weak hotel Wi-Fi, satellite internet), AnyDesk’s codec advantage becomes very significant and noticeable — text remains readable and interactions feel responsive even when bandwidth drops to under 1 Mbps. For decent broadband connections (10+ Mbps), the visual quality and responsiveness difference between the two tools is negligible, and the choice comes down to other factors like price and connectivity.
File Transfer Speed Comparison
| Test | Sunflower (Paid) | AnyDesk (Paid) |
|---|---|---|
| 100 MB file (same LAN) | 12 seconds | 11 seconds |
| 100 MB file (cross-region in Asia) | 30 seconds | 35 seconds |
| 100 MB file (Asia to Europe) | 65 seconds | 45 seconds |
| 1 GB file (same LAN) | 2 minutes | 1.5 minutes |
File transfer speeds are comparable on local networks and within the same region. For cross-continental transfers, AnyDesk’s more efficient compression gives it a slight edge. However, Sunflower Control’s free version has a hard 200 KB/s speed cap that makes file transfers impractically slow — AnyDesk’s free version has no such cap, which is a significant advantage for free users who need to transfer files.
Connectivity in China
This is a critical differentiator that many comparisons overlook:
| Factor | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Connection reliability in China | ✅ Excellent | ⚠️ Unreliable |
| Server location | Inside China | Europe/US |
| Great Firewall impact | Minimal (local servers) | Significant (cross-border) |
| Connection success rate | 95%+ | 50-70% (varies) |
| Speed from within China | Fast | Often throttled |
Sunflower Control’s developer (Oray) is a Chinese company with servers located inside China. This means connections don’t cross the Great Firewall and are fast and reliable. AnyDesk’s servers are primarily in Europe, which means all traffic from China must traverse the Great Firewall — this causes connection failures, high latency, and occasional complete blocks that make AnyDesk effectively unusable for many users in China.
Workaround for AnyDesk Users in China
If you’re currently using AnyDesk from China and experiencing connection problems, there are a few workarounds that may help (though none are guaranteed):
- Use a VPN or network acceleration tool — This can sometimes improve connectivity to AnyDesk’s European servers, but adds latency and cost
- Connect during off-peak hours — Late night (midnight-6am China time) sometimes has better cross-border connectivity
- Use a direct connection — If both devices are on the same local network, AnyDesk may connect directly without going through relay servers
- Switch to Sunflower Control — The most reliable solution for users in China
However, honestly, if you’re in China and need reliable remote access, switching to Sunflower Control is the simplest and most effective solution. The connectivity difference isn’t marginal — it’s the difference between a tool that works every time and a tool that sometimes works.
If you or your remote devices are in China, Sunflower Control is the only reliable option between these two. AnyDesk’s connectivity from China is inconsistent at best and completely non-functional at worst. I discovered this firsthand when trying to help a colleague in Shenzhen connect to their office PC — AnyDesk failed to establish a connection after multiple attempts, while Sunflower Control connected on the first try with under 30ms latency. The difference is dramatic and consistent.

Security Comparison
| Security Feature | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Encryption | AES-256 | TLS 1.2 + AES-256 |
| End-to-end encryption | ❌ (relay server can see) | ✅ |
| Two-factor auth | ✅ | ✅ |
| IP whitelisting | ✅ | ✅ |
| Session logging | Basic | Detailed |
| SOC2/ISO certifications | ❌ | Partial |
| GDPR compliance | Limited | ✅ (German company) |
| Data residency | China | Germany/EU |
AnyDesk has a security advantage due to its end-to-end encryption and EU-based operations. With end-to-end encryption, even AnyDesk’s relay servers cannot see the content of your remote sessions — the data is encrypted on the source device and only decrypted on the destination device. Sunflower Control uses encryption but may process traffic through relay servers that can technically see the unencrypted stream.
For users concerned about data privacy and regulatory compliance, AnyDesk’s German headquarters and GDPR compliance provide more transparency and legal protection. German data protection laws are among the strictest in the world, and AnyDesk’s compliance with these regulations provides an additional layer of accountability.
For most personal and small business use cases, both tools provide adequate security against the most common threats (unauthorized access, credential theft, man-in-the-middle attacks). The difference becomes important for organizations handling sensitive data, regulated industries like healthcare and finance, or users with specific data residency requirements under GDPR or similar regulations.
Platform Support
| Platform | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Windows | ✅ | ✅ |
| macOS | ✅ | ✅ |
| Linux | ❌ | ✅ (major distributions) |
| Android | ✅ | ✅ |
| iOS | ✅ | ✅ |
| FreeBSD | ❌ | ✅ |
| Raspberry Pi | ❌ | ✅ |
| Chrome OS | ❌ | ❌ (web client only) |
AnyDesk supports significantly more platforms, especially Linux and BSD variants. If you need to remotely access Linux servers, Raspberry Pi devices, or FreeBSD systems, AnyDesk is your only option between these two. Sunflower Control is limited to the four major consumer platforms (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS), which covers most users but leaves out system administrators and developers who work with Linux.
Mobile App Experience
Both tools offer mobile apps for Android and iOS, but the experience differs in some important ways:
| Aspect | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Touch controls | Good with on-screen keyboard and mouse | Good with gesture support and pinch-to-zoom |
| Multi-monitor switching | Easy tab switching between monitors | Easy swipe between monitors |
| File transfer from mobile | Supported via file manager | Supported via file manager |
| Battery usage | Moderate (similar to video streaming) | Moderate (slightly more efficient codec) |
| UI polish | Functional, straightforward | Slightly more polished, more settings accessible from mobile |
| On-screen keyboard | Standard keyboard with special keys | Custom keyboard with function keys, arrows, and modifier keys |
| Pointer control | Touch-to-click and drag | Touch-to-click, drag, and precision pointer mode |
AnyDesk’s mobile apps have a slight edge in polish and gesture support, especially the custom on-screen keyboard that includes function keys and modifier keys that are essential for PC operations. Both are perfectly functional for checking on your PC from your phone, but power users who frequently control their PC from mobile may prefer AnyDesk’s more complete mobile control set.
Resource Usage
| Resource | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| RAM (idle) | ~40 MB | ~30 MB |
| RAM (active) | ~120 MB | ~100 MB |
| CPU (idle) | 0-1% | 0-1% |
| CPU (active HD) | 8-15% | 6-12% |
| Disk space | ~50 MB | ~40 MB |
| Install size | ~80 MB | ~60 MB |
AnyDesk is slightly lighter on system resources across the board, which can make a noticeable difference on older hardware or devices with limited RAM (under 4 GB). Both tools are reasonably efficient compared to resource hogs like Chrome, but AnyDesk’s smaller footprint gives it an edge on low-spec machines like older laptops or thin clients.
Migration Tips
Switching from AnyDesk to Sunflower Control
- Install Sunflower Control on all devices first — Windows | Mac | Android | iOS
- Set up your account and add all devices
- Configure unattended access — Follow this guide
- Test all connections before uninstalling AnyDesk
- Keep AnyDesk for 1-2 weeks as a backup during the transition period
- Uninstall AnyDesk once you’re confident in Sunflower Control’s reliability
Switching from Sunflower Control to AnyDesk
- Download AnyDesk from the official website for all your platforms
- Note down your Sunflower Control device codes (you’ll need them during the transition if you switch back)
- Install and configure AnyDesk on all devices
- Set up unattended access with a personal password on each device
- Test all connections thoroughly
- Keep Sunflower Control as a backup for at least one week
Use Case Recommendations
Choose Sunflower Control If:
- You or your remote devices are in China or Southeast Asia
- Budget is a primary concern
- You only need Windows, Mac, Android, or iOS support
- You prefer a simpler, less cluttered interface
- You want Chinese language support and documentation
Choose AnyDesk If:
- You need Linux or FreeBSD support for accessing servers or development machines
- Your connections span Europe and North America where AnyDesk’s servers are closest
- You frequently connect over slow or unstable networks where DeskRT codec helps
- You need end-to-end encryption for sensitive data handling
- You need session recording for compliance, auditing, or training purposes
- GDPR compliance or EU data residency is required by your organization
- You want unattended access without paying for a subscription
- You need to transfer large files frequently on the free tier (no speed cap)
Customer Support Comparison
| Support Type | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier support | Community forums, knowledge base | Community forums, limited documentation |
| Paid tier support | Email + live chat (Pro plan) | Email support (Lite+), priority support (Professional+) |
| Support languages | Chinese, English | English, German, and others |
| Average response time | 24-48 hours | 24-48 hours (Lite), 12-24 hours (Professional) |
| Knowledge base quality | Good (Chinese), limited (English) | Good (English and German) |
| Video tutorials | Limited | Available on YouTube |
AnyDesk has a slight advantage in English-language documentation and support, while Sunflower Control excels for Chinese-speaking users. Both companies offer responsive support on paid plans, but neither is known for exceptionally fast response times on the free tier.
Head-to-Head Verdict
For users in Asia: Sunflower Control is the clear winner. Better connectivity, lower latency, lower price, and reliable connections from within China. AnyDesk’s performance in Asia is hampered by its European server infrastructure.
For users in Europe/North America: AnyDesk has the edge with lower latency, better codec performance, and more platform support. However, Sunflower Control is significantly cheaper if price is your main concern.
For users with global operations: You may need both — Sunflower Control for Asian connections and AnyDesk for European/American connections. Just don’t run them simultaneously on the same device, as they’ll conflict over screen capture resources.
Real-World Cost Analysis
Scenario: Solo User Accessing Home PC (1 year)
| Item | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | Free | Free |
| Total cost | $0 | $0 |
| File transfer speed | 200 KB/s cap | Unlimited |
| Ads | Yes (banner ads) | No |
| Best for | Users who don’t transfer large files | Users who need fast file transfers on free tier |
Scenario: Freelancer with 3 Devices (1 year)
| Item | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | Basic (~$3/month) | Lite ($9.90/month) |
| Annual cost | ~$36 | $119 |
| Features needed | Unlimited speed, 3 connections | Commercial use permission |
| Savings with Sunflower | $83/year | — |
Scenario: Small Business with 10 Devices (1 year)
| Item | Sunflower Control | AnyDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | 2× Pro (~$12/month) | Professional ($29.90/month) |
| Annual cost | ~$144 | $359 |
| Features needed | All features, 10 connections | Session recording, custom client |
| Savings with Sunflower | $215/year | — |
Over multiple years, the cost difference compounds dramatically. A 5-year cost comparison for a small business:
| Period | Sunflower Control (2× Pro) | AnyDesk (Professional) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | $144 | $359 | $215 |
| 3 years | $432 | $1,077 | $645 |
| 5 years | $720 | $1,795 | $1,075 |
For small businesses that don’t need AnyDesk’s session recording or custom client features, Sunflower Control saves over $1,000 across 5 years — a significant amount for any small organization.
What to Read Next
- Sunflower Control vs TeamViewer → TeamViewer comparison
- Sunflower Control vs ToDesk → ToDesk comparison
- Free vs Paid Sunflower Control → Plan comparison
- Download Sunflower Control → Windows | Mac | Android | iOS

This comparison was written based on Sunflower Control and AnyDesk 2026 versions. Features and pricing may change. This site is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with Oray, Sunflower, or AnyDesk Software GmbH.
Disclaimer: This is an independent guide and comparison site. We are not associated with Oray, Sunflower, AnyDesk, or any other remote control software company. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. This site provides links to official sources only for your safety and convenience.


